Was Bill Gates Lucky? How about Einstein?

June 7th, 2007 by Hal

We often discount great accomplishments by saying people were just lucky. The luncheon speaker at the TWI Summit says otherwise. Luncheon speakers are about as good as the conference budget allows. I wasn't expecting much at the TWI Summit. It's the first of its kind conference. While it was the largest meeting of TWI proponents in over 50 years, it was only about 135 people. Boy was I surprised by the luncheon speaker on the first day. Jim Swartz spoke about finding and seizing great opportunities. His talk was based on his book Seeing David in the Stone, by James and Joseph Swartz.

Due to significant Florida weather delays, I had the opportunity to read and finish Seeing David in the Stone in one setting. I am impressed. Very impressed. I shouldn't be. Norman Bodek introduced Jim to me calling him a genius. After listening to his speech, being in a private conversation and reading the book I can see that Norman is right. Not only is he a genius, he's written an easy-to-read and engaging book.

The book is based on many years of private research into what makes the great ones successful. They studied 70 great people to discover what was common among them. In addition to Gates and Einstein, the authors studied Galileo, Edison, Michaelangelo, DaVinci, Pasteur, Curie, Eisenhower, and Walton. The authors identified three groups of behaviors with a total of 12 actions. Here they are:

Finding & Seizing Great Opportunities

  • Seize Great Opportunities
    1. Develop other innovators and high achievers
    2. Deliver rewards
    3. Seize rapidly at high-leverage points
    4. Use superior design and planning processes

  • Mobilize Support
    1. Find common meaning with and negotiate with opposers
    2. Sell the opportunity to those that are cautious
    3. Co-create with those eager for opportunity
    4. Find the highest meanings of others

  • Find Great Opportunities
    1. Select only high-leverage opportunities
    2. Learn to envision opportunities
    3. Use powerful learning processes
    4. Differentiate yourself for opportunity

Jim gave away 80 books at the evening's reception. While people stood in line for the free book, they lingered to have a conversation with the author. I was one who did more than my fair share of lingering. I urge you to do your own lingering with his book.

Related Posts

  • Hal’s Baaack!
  • Sorry for not posting on lean project delivery, but September was a very busy month. In short, I anticipated it would ...
     
  • Rules for Renegades and Project Reformers
  • Authors and their publicists regularly offer me books in hope I'll write a good review. I usually do write good revie...
     
  • PM Envy
  • Chris Tulino offers this cheeky view on project managers: Every project manager I know is looking for a "good" project....
     
  • Bill Waddell, Lean Provocateur
  • The next project kaizen Gang-of-Seven member is Bill Waddell. He co-writes the Evolving Excellence weblog for Superfa...
     
  • Ignorance is Risk
  • Just got to read the latest issue of Project @ Work. Bill Duncan, Project Management Partners, authored an op-ed piece ...
     
Social Bookmarking
Add to: Folkd Add to: Linkarena Add to: Digg Add to: Del.icio.us Add to: Reddit Add to: Simpy Add to: StumbleUpon Add to: Slashdot Add to: Netscape Add to: Furl Add to: Yahoo Add to: Spurl Add to: Google Add to: Blinklist Add to: Blogmarks Add to: Diigo Add to: Technorati Add to: Newsvine Add to: Blinkbits Add to: Ma.Gnolia Add to: Smarking Add to: Netvouz Information

One Response to “Was Bill Gates Lucky? How about Einstein?”

  1. Kathleen Says:

    I’m guessing the authors did not make note of what innumerable leading researchers currently believe these people all had in common. That all of these greats are likely to have had autism? The traits the authors describe are part and parcel, characteristic of persons on the autistic spectrum. It’s a given (as is typically, genius). Unfortunately, these are not traits or characteristics that the average person can easily incorporate into their lives, changing their behaviors.

    Just as one cannot “study harder” and learn more to become a genius, minimally, people who are neurologically typical do not have the interest or ability to adopt a lifelong perseverational interest with the end of dominating it utterly. Saying so tho, wouldn’t sell many books.

Comment On This

Note: This post is over a year old. You may want to check later in this blog to see if there is new information relevant to your comment.