Explaining Misunderstanding
Monday, March 27th, 2006I'm doing quite a bit of reading and research as I'm writing my book. Over the weekend I was reading about philosophical hermeneutics, the study of how we understand what is written, stated, or performed. I'm sharing a quote today from Hans-Georg Gadamer:
"(H)istory does not belong to us; but we belong to it."1
One implication is that we have no chance of understanding what others mean in their writing and speaking without first coming to appreciate our own historical way we arrived here today.
All projects have a predisposition for misunderstanding.
What does this have to do with projects? In all but straight-forward acts of coordination, we are more likely to misunderstand and be misunderstood than not. When we share opinions on what is good and bad, where there's opportunity and risk, what options for action are opened or closed, and what is possible and not possible, we are speaking (or listening) from a perspective of historical pre-judging. For instance, what has been good for me before shapes how I listen when others speak. Read the rest of this entry ¶
- Gadamer, Hans-Georg, Truth and Method, p 276, 1989. [ ⇑ back ]
Related Posts
- Ask Two Great Questions to Minimize Misunderstanding In my last posting I wrote about misunderstanding and a few things we can do to avoid it. One of the best practical a...
- Dare to Be Naive I've been doing quite a bit of writing lately about lean and kaizen. I'm taking a break today from sharing my own wri...
- Planning, Scheduling, and Forecasting Glen Alleman took me to task for yesterday's posting Misunderstanding Project Planning as Anticipation. He wrote a ra...
- Combining Lean and Agile in Construction Agile and Lean theories were used to design the mechanical and electrical construction processes. The success of a lea...
- Combining Lean and Agile in Construction Agile and Lean theories were used to design the mechanical and electrical construction processes. The success of a lea...










