<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.5" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Match Project Assignments to Performer Capability</title>
	<link>http://www.reformingprojectmanagement.com/2005/06/13/489/</link>
	<description>The magazine for the project age</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 15:30:36 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.5</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Fernando M. Coriano</title>
		<link>http://www.reformingprojectmanagement.com/2005/06/13/489/#comment-986</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2005 22:02:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.reformingprojectmanagement.com/2005/06/13/489/#comment-986</guid>
					<description>Good insight.  I've always wondered about the projects that went sour.  Looking back several did not fit the PM.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good insight.  I&#8217;ve always wondered about the projects that went sour.  Looking back several did not fit the PM.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Michael Port</title>
		<link>http://www.reformingprojectmanagement.com/2005/06/13/489/#comment-985</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2005 10:01:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.reformingprojectmanagement.com/2005/06/13/489/#comment-985</guid>
					<description>Thank you for that post Hal. I always learn something when reading your blog. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for that post Hal. I always learn something when reading your blog.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
