<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.5" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Who Do You Want at OSHA?</title>
	<link>http://www.reformingprojectmanagement.com/2004/12/09/439/</link>
	<description>The magazine for the project age</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 19:30:11 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.5</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Sven Bertelsen
        </title>
		<link>http://www.reformingprojectmanagement.com/2004/12/09/439/#comment-274</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.reformingprojectmanagement.com/2004/12/09/439/#comment-274</guid>
					<description>
        Hal,

I think they cut the rate by 50% only, but I am still not aware of any other single effort in construction having given anything nearly as good.

An interesting point is that it is through implementing lean project managemnt only they obtained the result. Their non-lean projects (where they act as subs and are managed by other, non lean firms)have still the old and much higher accident rate. From this I conclude that there has been no influence of safety campaigns, weather conditions or similar as we are looking at the same comany and same two year plus period.

Sven
      </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hal,</p>
<p>I think they cut the rate by 50% only, but I am still not aware of any other single effort in construction having given anything nearly as good.</p>
<p>An interesting point is that it is through implementing lean project managemnt only they obtained the result. Their non-lean projects (where they act as subs and are managed by other, non lean firms)have still the old and much higher accident rate. From this I conclude that there has been no influence of safety campaigns, weather conditions or similar as we are looking at the same comany and same two year plus period.</p>
<p>Sven
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
