<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.5" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Project Meeting Protocols</title>
	<link>http://www.reformingprojectmanagement.com/2004/12/06/441/</link>
	<description>The magazine for the project age</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 05:53:43 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.5</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Evelyn Mitchell
        </title>
		<link>http://www.reformingprojectmanagement.com/2004/12/06/441/#comment-273</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.reformingprojectmanagement.com/2004/12/06/441/#comment-273</guid>
					<description>
        I look forward to hearing more about these protocols. They sound like the Plan-Do-Check-Act cycle:

Look-Ahead Planning = Plan
Weekly Work Planning = Do
Daily coordination = Check
System Improvement = Act

Your terms are much clearer than PDCA  on first reading. (What's the difference between Do and Act to the average listener?)
      </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I look forward to hearing more about these protocols. They sound like the Plan-Do-Check-Act cycle:</p>
<p>Look-Ahead Planning = Plan<br />
Weekly Work Planning = Do<br />
Daily coordination = Check<br />
System Improvement = Act</p>
<p>Your terms are much clearer than <acronym title="Plan, Do, Check, Act/Adjust -- Deming/Shewhart cycle of improvement">PDCA</acronym>  on first reading. (What&#8217;s the difference between Do and Act to the average listener?)
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
