<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.5" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The New Project Management Paradigm</title>
	<link>http://www.reformingprojectmanagement.com/2004/06/18/366/</link>
	<description>The magazine for the project age</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 05:20:19 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.5</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Matt
        </title>
		<link>http://www.reformingprojectmanagement.com/2004/06/18/366/#comment-226</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.reformingprojectmanagement.com/2004/06/18/366/#comment-226</guid>
					<description>
        He seems to be arguing that buildings in particular are becoming industrial commodities, hence operational process management will be the preferred model, rather than PM.  I can't see this being true for all buildings (only the little boxes on the hillside), let alone projects in general.  This is not a new paradigm, only a much older one in an already traditionalist industry sector.
      </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He seems to be arguing that buildings in particular are becoming industrial commodities, hence operational process management will be the preferred model, rather than PM.  I can&#8217;t see this being true for all buildings (only the little boxes on the hillside), let alone projects in general.  This is not a new paradigm, only a much older one in an already traditionalist industry sector.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
