Multi-Task Your Way to Un-Profitability

March 29th, 2004 by Hal

I so am enjoying Frank Patrick's series on Projects and Promises. Part 4 - Multi-Project & Mixed-Function Multi-Tasking is a gem.

(P)rojects are usually delivered as one of a portfolio of efforts and often share resources with others in the pipeline. It is not unusual for scarce, highly skilled contributors to support multiple projects. The usual response to having a lot of work in one's inbox is to use the squeaky wheel method of prioritization. Whichever project is squeaking the loudest in the morning gets attention for the day, whether the previous day's task is completed or not.

Professional service firms have adopted multi-tasking as a strategy for profitability. Keep engineers very busy and profit will be optimized. Turns out, there's a limit to that.

(B)ouncing back and forth between unfinished tasks in an effort to show progress merely delays all the handoffs involved and wastes valuable capacity in unnecessary set-down, set-up, and "Where was I?" questions at every restart.

Not only do those starts and stops add to the time it takes to do the project tasks, they take away from the quality of the work performed. "Where was I?" is every engineer's lament. Not convinced? Have a look at Franks' simple graphic of multi-tasking. You'll be motivated to eliminate the practice.

For more on multi-tasking read Head-Banging in the A/E Industry.

Related Posts

Social Bookmarking
Add to: Folkd Add to: Linkarena Add to: Digg Add to: Del.icio.us Add to: Reddit Add to: Simpy Add to: StumbleUpon Add to: Slashdot Add to: Netscape Add to: Furl Add to: Yahoo Add to: Spurl Add to: Google Add to: Blinklist Add to: Blogmarks Add to: Diigo Add to: Technorati Add to: Newsvine Add to: Blinkbits Add to: Ma.Gnolia Add to: Smarking Add to: Netvouz Information

Comment On This

Note: This post is over 4 years old. You may want to check later in this blog to see if there is new information relevant to your comment.