<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.5" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Can Blogs Aid in the Role of Management?</title>
	<link>http://www.reformingprojectmanagement.com/2003/04/25/143/</link>
	<description>The magazine for the project age</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 00:04:22 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.5</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Bernard Ertl
        </title>
		<link>http://www.reformingprojectmanagement.com/2003/04/25/143/#comment-344</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.reformingprojectmanagement.com/2003/04/25/143/#comment-344</guid>
					<description>
        Hi Hal,

Project collaboration software is (now) widely available.  What advantages does blogging offer over these alternatives?
      </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Hal,</p>
<p>Project collaboration software is (now) widely available.  What advantages does blogging offer over these alternatives?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Hal
        </title>
		<link>http://www.reformingprojectmanagement.com/2003/04/25/143/#comment-345</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.reformingprojectmanagement.com/2003/04/25/143/#comment-345</guid>
					<description>
        The first 'advantage' is the ease of setting up a weblog for a project.  A second advantage has to do with the flexibility and versatility of weblogs.  A team can choose to follow protocols or not, to have a project blogger or team blogging, and to archive or not.

While project collaboration tools have been around for over ten years (Lotus Notes) the use of those tools has produced mixed results.  For the most part I see this as matters of the design team practices and the inertia of individual habits.  Teams are together for relatively short times.  Further, many team members only participate for part of the life of the project.  I don't see team leaders taking the time to design (declare) the practices for coordination and the following discipline to carry out the designs.  This holds for formal collaboration environments as well as the informal blogging environment.

One further note...so much of what we see in collaboration tools comes from the management as problem-solving or management as decision-making paradigm.  While it's true that the collaboration tools can be used in ways more in line with a linguistic action perspective, they tend not to be used that way.  I think this has to do with our commonsense.  You see we share a commonsense that is all wrapped-up in the pursuit of optimal circumstances -- the one right way -- that conforms to the paradigm above.  People need help engaging in a different way, a way that embraces our humanness without throwing away the best of the other paradigm.

I intended to provide exactly that help in my Proposal for a P-Log Specification.
      </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The first &#8216;advantage&#8217; is the ease of setting up a weblog for a project.  A second advantage has to do with the flexibility and versatility of weblogs.  A team can choose to follow protocols or not, to have a project blogger or team blogging, and to archive or not.</p>
<p>While project collaboration tools have been around for over ten years (Lotus Notes) the use of those tools has produced mixed results.  For the most part I see this as matters of the design team practices and the inertia of individual habits.  Teams are together for relatively short times.  Further, many team members only participate for part of the life of the project.  I don&#8217;t see team leaders taking the time to design (declare) the practices for coordination and the following discipline to carry out the designs.  This holds for formal collaboration environments as well as the informal blogging environment.</p>
<p>One further note&#8230;so much of what we see in collaboration tools comes from the management as problem-solving or management as decision-making paradigm.  While it&#8217;s true that the collaboration tools can be used in ways more in line with a linguistic action perspective, they tend not to be used that way.  I think this has to do with our commonsense.  You see we share a commonsense that is all wrapped-up in the pursuit of optimal circumstances &#8212; the one right way &#8212; that conforms to the paradigm above.  People need help engaging in a different way, a way that embraces our humanness without throwing away the best of the other paradigm.</p>
<p>I intended to provide exactly that help in my Proposal for a P-Log Specification.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
