<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.5" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Building a Project Website the Easy Way</title>
	<link>http://www.reformingprojectmanagement.com/2003/03/18/127/</link>
	<description>The magazine for the project age</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 08:42:29 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.5</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: BillSeitz
        </title>
		<link>http://www.reformingprojectmanagement.com/2003/03/18/127/#comment-297</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.reformingprojectmanagement.com/2003/03/18/127/#comment-297</guid>
					<description>
        A wiki-powered intranet makes it muchmore likely that such documents gets refined and kept current.

http://webseitz.fluxent.com/wiki/WikiForCollaborationWare
      </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A wiki-powered intranet makes it muchmore likely that such documents gets refined and kept current.</p>
<p><a href="http://webseitz.fluxent.com/wiki/WikiForCollaborationWare" rel="nofollow">http://webseitz.fluxent.com/wiki/WikiForCollaborationWare</a>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Hal
        </title>
		<link>http://www.reformingprojectmanagement.com/2003/03/18/127/#comment-298</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.reformingprojectmanagement.com/2003/03/18/127/#comment-298</guid>
					<description>
        Bill,

Thanks.  I've read your paper before.  I'll go back and read it again.  In the meantime, what is it in particular about Wikis that make them more suitable for the project environment than group blogs?  Also, blogging has exploded.  Are we seeing in your opinion a VHS vs Betamax thing going on here?  Wikis are technincaly better, but the world is moving to blogs?

Hal
      </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bill,</p>
<p>Thanks.  I&#8217;ve read your paper before.  I&#8217;ll go back and read it again.  In the meantime, what is it in particular about Wikis that make them more suitable for the project environment than group blogs?  Also, blogging has exploded.  Are we seeing in your opinion a VHS vs Betamax thing going on here?  Wikis are technincaly better, but the world is moving to blogs?</p>
<p>Hal
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: BillSeitz
        </title>
		<link>http://www.reformingprojectmanagement.com/2003/03/18/127/#comment-299</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.reformingprojectmanagement.com/2003/03/18/127/#comment-299</guid>
					<description>
        I see the key advantages of Wiki being

* it encourages you to put all project docs right in the docspace, whereas blogs often drive longer documents to attachments. This allows/encourages any team member to makes changes as appropriate. It also encourages breaking up longer documents into logical pieces which are more easily scanned. And a single Search returns both reference docs and blog entries.

* all such documents get cross-linked more heavily than in blogs. Likewise, blog entries can refer to a number of longer documents.

* more naturally multi-user

I'm not sure the VHS/Betamax analogy works. A single team won't use both at the same time, but other than that I don't see a big lock-in or networking-effect issue.
      </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see the key advantages of Wiki being</p>
<p>* it encourages you to put all project docs right in the docspace, whereas blogs often drive longer documents to attachments. This allows/encourages any team member to makes changes as appropriate. It also encourages breaking up longer documents into logical pieces which are more easily scanned. And a single Search returns both reference docs and blog entries.</p>
<p>* all such documents get cross-linked more heavily than in blogs. Likewise, blog entries can refer to a number of longer documents.</p>
<p>* more naturally multi-user</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure the VHS/Betamax analogy works. A single team won&#8217;t use both at the same time, but other than that I don&#8217;t see a big lock-in or networking-effect issue.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Hal
        </title>
		<link>http://www.reformingprojectmanagement.com/2003/03/18/127/#comment-300</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.reformingprojectmanagement.com/2003/03/18/127/#comment-300</guid>
					<description>
        Thanks Bill.  It's time for me to update my p-log comments.  I'll direct folks to your comments and Twicki.
      </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Bill.  It&#8217;s time for me to update my p-log comments.  I&#8217;ll direct folks to your comments and Twicki.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
