<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.5" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Can the Reform of Project Management Succeed?</title>
	<link>http://www.reformingprojectmanagement.com/2003/01/28/86/</link>
	<description>The magazine for the project age</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 00:06:09 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.5</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Kalyan Vaidyanathan
        </title>
		<link>http://www.reformingprojectmanagement.com/2003/01/28/86/#comment-446</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.reformingprojectmanagement.com/2003/01/28/86/#comment-446</guid>
					<description>
        Hi Hal,
  I sure hope he is wrong.  Personally, I think the project management theory is dated and needs to graduate to take advantage of the latest tools and knowledge.  Personally, am a big fan of controlling variability and providing visibility by drawing analogies and learning from SCM tools that manufacturing industries use.  There is a lot of inefficiency in the system that can be squeezed out provided change management can be handled.
      </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Hal,<br />
  I sure hope he is wrong.  Personally, I think the project management theory is dated and needs to graduate to take advantage of the latest tools and knowledge.  Personally, am a big fan of controlling variability and providing visibility by drawing analogies and learning from SCM tools that manufacturing industries use.  There is a lot of inefficiency in the system that can be squeezed out provided change management can be handled.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Mary Poppendieck
        </title>
		<link>http://www.reformingprojectmanagement.com/2003/01/28/86/#comment-447</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.reformingprojectmanagement.com/2003/01/28/86/#comment-447</guid>
					<description>
        This editorial pointed to another article which I highly recommend:
A Long Term View of Project Management : Its Past and Its Likely Future at:
http://www.pmforum.org/library/papers/MARTIN%20BARNES%20Berlin%20June%202002%20revised%20post%20conference.htm
      </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This editorial pointed to another article which I highly recommend:<br />
A Long Term View of Project Management : Its Past and Its Likely Future at:<br />
<a href="http://www.pmforum.org/library/papers/MARTIN%20BARNES%20Berlin%20June%202002%20revised%20post%20conference.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.pmforum.org/library/papers/MARTIN%20BARNES%20Berlin%20June%202002%20revised%20post%20conference.htm</a>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
