<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.5" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Converging on a New Theory</title>
	<link>http://www.reformingprojectmanagement.com/2002/11/04/67/</link>
	<description>The magazine for the project age</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 05:59:23 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.5</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Buck
        </title>
		<link>http://www.reformingprojectmanagement.com/2002/11/04/67/#comment-406</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.reformingprojectmanagement.com/2002/11/04/67/#comment-406</guid>
					<description>
        Hi Hal,
I believe in your quest for a complex adaptive system I could offer the japanese approach Kaizen as an option.

Always optimize/rethink your decisions, processes and so forth.
I guess this approach covers it pretty well.
Unfortunately I have only seen tries in Kaizen end up in Micromanagement to death, until one day all involved were fed up. 
I guess there also was a considerable lack of willingness to change ;-)

Bye

Buck
      </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Hal,<br />
I believe in your quest for a complex adaptive system I could offer the japanese approach <acronym title="Japanese term for continuous improvement">kaizen</acronym> as an option.</p>
<p>Always optimize/rethink your decisions, processes and so forth.<br />
I guess this approach covers it pretty well.<br />
Unfortunately I have only seen tries in <acronym title="Japanese term for continuous improvement">kaizen</acronym> end up in Micromanagement to death, until one day all involved were fed up.<br />
I guess there also was a considerable lack of willingness to change <img src='http://www.reformingprojectmanagement.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Bye</p>
<p>Buck
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
