<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.5" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Somewhere Near Wilmington People Moved to the Center</title>
	<link>http://www.reformingprojectmanagement.com/2002/10/21/32/</link>
	<description>The magazine for the project age</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 13:40:43 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.5</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Buck
        </title>
		<link>http://www.reformingprojectmanagement.com/2002/10/21/32/#comment-389</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.reformingprojectmanagement.com/2002/10/21/32/#comment-389</guid>
					<description>
        Hi,
I believe that this development of projects (through demand+supply ok and some talking)
usually gets hazier the larger the company is where the people work in.
They feel more and more like a little nut or bolt inside a huge maschinery,
completely forgetting, that it`s these nuts and bolts that form the maschinery altogether...

Bye

Buck
      </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,<br />
I believe that this development of projects (through demand+supply ok and some talking)<br />
usually gets hazier the larger the company is where the people work in.<br />
They feel more and more like a little nut or bolt inside a huge maschinery,<br />
completely forgetting, that it`s these nuts and bolts that form the maschinery altogether&#8230;</p>
<p>Bye</p>
<p>Buck
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Hal
        </title>
		<link>http://www.reformingprojectmanagement.com/2002/10/21/32/#comment-390</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.reformingprojectmanagement.com/2002/10/21/32/#comment-390</guid>
					<description>
        Buck, let me offer another question.  Is 'saving face' (for both parties) more important than performing well together?

The question is rhetorical.  Projects present a situation where one failed action (promise) can result in a stream of missed commitments, often with significant negative consequences.  Looking good (saving face) gets in the way of making promises that are reliable AND result in not looking good when the promise goes unfulfilled!

Yes I address the issue of looking good.  It results from being reliable.
      </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Buck, let me offer another question.  Is &#8217;saving face&#8217; (for both parties) more important than performing well together?</p>
<p>The question is rhetorical.  Projects present a situation where one failed action (promise) can result in a stream of missed commitments, often with significant negative consequences.  Looking good (saving face) gets in the way of making promises that are reliable AND result in not looking good when the promise goes unfulfilled!</p>
<p>Yes I address the issue of looking good.  It results from being reliable.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
