Comments on the Fool Me Once, Twice Comments

October 7th, 2002 by Hal

Article Series - CPM: Fool Me Once, Fool Me Twice

CPM: Fool Me Once
CPM: Fool Me Twice
CPM: Fool Me Again
Fool Me Again and Again!
Let's Not Be Fooled
Comments on the Fool Me Once, Twice Comments
PDF Available of CPM: Fool Me Once, Fool Me Twice

Some very thoughtful comments were made on some of the postings from last week's series on CPM. I urge you to read those comments. Just click on the "(#) Comments" link at the end of each posting wherever you see a number other than "Please Comment". I urge you to leave comments as well.

If what people were doing was working there'd be no reason to do something else!

A few people asked me what I was planning to do with the Fool Me Once, Fool Me Twiceseries. Based on the requests I've decided to compile the five postings as a single document that I'll link on the site. That document can be freely downloaded and distributed. I hope you find it valuable.

Now for those wondering what got me going on the series in the first place, I've been somewhat concerned about people who set out to adopt a new approach (to anything) while trying their hardest not to give up what they are doing. If what they were doing was working there'd be no reason to do something else! We know in the case of project planning and control that it routinely doesn't work.

Continuing to do the old has three negative effects on succeeding with the new:

It maintains the inertia of the current practice
It consumes scarce attention and capacity for adopting the unfamiliar and initially time-consuming practice
It reinforces the measurement and rewards associated with the old

Using the Critical Path Method for project planning and control is just one of those practices that seems like a good idea, but fails in execution. One issue I failed to stress last week is the lack of seriousness given to CPM as evidenced by not providing the resources to do a good job keeping the schedules always up-to-date. There is a trend seen in construction where people are preparing the CPM schedules yet they don't know how to build and don't know scheduling¹. Lack of seriousness and competence spells disaster for the project participants. Not doing CPM scheduling in many cases would be far better than doing it the current way. And certainly for those people who are dissatisfied enough to try a different approach they should give up trying to do both.

Stop the craziness of doing the old and the new.

As reported in ENR [ ⇑ back ]

Comments are now working again

Claude Emond, Guest Blogger

Commenting has been flaky

Meet Claude Emond

Let’s Hear a Big “Woo Hoo” for OSHA

This entry was posted on Monday, October 7th, 2002 at 9:59 am and is tagged: PM practice, project planning, project scheduling, CPM. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed. Convert this post to a PDF document.

Social Bookmarking

Comment On This

If you haven't left a comment here before, you will need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.

On the Side

Construction Software Selection Checklist
08/23/2008
Houston Neal offers a high-level feature comparison checklist for beginning a software evaluation.

Wisdom from Professor Rao
08/22/2008
"Smart organizations make difficult things simple," from Bob Sutton's Work Matters.

Think Visual
07/20/2008
Check out Dave Gray | info, a new website giving attention to ways of meaning, thinking and working by the founder of XPLANE and chief blogger at Communication Nation.

Who Knows Engineers?
07/14/2008

Curious blog We Know Engineers on A/E firms. Worth checking out.

Comparing Lean and Agile
06/29/2008
Scott Reynolds writing at Tales from the SharpSide, "Lean forces you into a culture of quality. Agile is about interactions and people, and Lean is very much concerned with tools and processes." Read more about Lean vs. Agile...

Glen Alleman's Models of PM Success
06/24/2008

Glen makes two big claims:

If you don't have a credible plan and schedule, with a handle on the cost all the "soft" skills won't get you back on track
If you don't have a definitive description of what "done" looks like, so the "soft skills" class won't make those appear

Have a look at his comprehensive stand on organizing and managing projects.

Read Robert Sutton's Blog
05/16/2008

Learn from a Stanford d.School prof. Robert Sutton has a great weblog Work Matters and he's the author of The Knowing-Doing Gap and The No Assholes Rule.

Humility Makes Toyota Different
02/20/2008

From the Lean Insider: Speaking to Toyota employees at the Detroit Auto Show President Watanabe asked that they take responsibility for recent quality problems.

"I do not regard the problem as something that suppliers are responsible for. We must work together so that we are fully aware of where suppliers are."

Bernstein closes saying, "At Toyota, they know that doing the best job of serving the customer is what makes the company profitable."

Lean Project Management
02/19/2008

Brad Appleton reviewed Lean Project Management, by L Leach concluding, "I found Lean Project Management to be a fairly quick read providing a good overview of some TOC and CCPM fundamentals and how they align with Lean thinking."

Claude Emond, Guest Blogger
01/11/2008

I'm glad to have Claude posting at RPM. It was Claude who gave name to these wonder filled times -- the project age. Please welcome him with your comments.